I fear that I read Muriel Spark’s Not to Disturb too soon after having been enthralled and confused by The Driver’s Seat. The two novels deal with such similar themes and the same sense of eerie prediction of death, but Not to Disturb had much less of an impact. As a storm brews around a mansion, the servants prepare for a tragedy. The intimation of death is much like that of The Driver’s Seat, but rather than an atmosphere of threat and foreboding, the story here drags and the mystery is largely irrelevant.
‘They are still alive,’ says Lister. ‘I’m sure of that. It hasn’t happened yet.’
‘It’s going to happen,’ she says.
‘Oh my dear, it’s inevitable.’
Not to Disturb focuses on the servants of a Baron and Baroness, and “him in the attic”, a mentally deranged man kept in the attic with a nurse. The Baron and Baroness are meeting with their secretary Victor in the library, and the head butler has been told that under no circumstances is he to disturb them. The servants are preparing themselves for the imminent death of someone in the library and the onslaught of journalists and outsiders that are sure to follow afterward. They’ve all written their memoirs, they practice their interview responses, they work on getting their stories straight. However, it is never clear exactly how they know what is to happen during the night. Could it be that the house and the lives of the Baron and Baroness run so smoothly thanks to the endless toil of the servants, and the servants are so attuned to the behaviour and lives of their masters that they can see the murder/suicide coming? Is it merely a well-informed prediction? It’s never quite revealed.
‘Locked’ says Lister, turning away, ‘and silent. Let’s proceed,’ he says, leading the way to the servants quarters. ‘There remain a good many things to be accomplished and still more chaos effectively to organize.’
Much of the story looks at the rampant opportunism of the servants. Not only do they look to cash in on the aftermath of the deaths, but they organize a slapdash marraige between the pregnant parlour maid Heloise and “him in the attic”, the Baron’s relative Gustav, heir to the family fortune. After this admittedly comedic farce it seems possible that the servants orchestrated the murder in order to get their hands on the inheritance, as well as profit from their media deals. None of these questions are really answered, but not much is offered in the way of coming up with our own answers to this. Overall, I was unimpressed with Not to Disturb, but I wonder how much of that comes from having read it so soon after The Driver’s Seat.
