For my birthday this year, a group of friends and I went on the Haunted Melbourne walking tour. The host constantly lamented the lack of old buildings in which these ghostly sightings or morbid stories had occurred. While I imagine that the structural evolution of a city somewhat hampers attempts to revisit its supernatural past, in Melbourne Remade: The Inner City Since the 70s, Seamus O’Hanlon takes us through the myriad of architectural changes within Melbourne’s centre since the 1970s and how they represent the shift from an industrial history to a post-industrial society.
O’Hanlon covers much of the inner city of Melbourne, as well as the hip inner suburbs. Looking at different aspects – landmarks, retail, the Yarra river, events and the iconic streets – he outlines the significant development of Melbourne since the 1970s. Not simply reminiscing the loss of historical structures, O’Hanlon instead insists that history is evident not just within the heritage listed buildings, but in the evolution enforced by changing social, cultural and economic shifts.
Mainly, it is a pleasure to learn stories about places that have become so routine that it’s easy to forget their long history as they are so gradually removed from their past. Take Melbourne Central, for example. Now a bustling underground train station and modern entertainment and retail complex, it was once a closed off and dominated by department store Daimaru. I remember getting lost within the maze and seeming lack of exits many times, or struggling to even find a way into the building. O’Hanlon also points to how the integration of the new, more open retail space with laneways not only opens up Melbourne Central to the surrounding streets and make it more inviting, but also places it within the larger context of Melbourne itself. The now iconic Melbourne laneways exist as almost polar opposites to the mega-development schemes that dominated the city for many years. Here we see the small scale, quirky and local enliven and define the city space, even as they exist alongside the massive globally financed structures.
Soon after completion the Rialto was dubbed ‘Melbourne’s Ayers Rock’ by journalist Keith Dunston; like a member of other former Collins Street defenders Dunstan found himself something of a reluctant fan of the building’s twin blue glass towers that seem to change colour depending on the time of day and direction of the sun. The beauty of the building is breathtaking, especially from a distance. One of the best ways to see it in all its glory is from the West Gate Bridge at dusk. Even up close it has a majesty that’s difficult to describe.
It would be too easy to simply recite all the interesting changes that have taken place over the past forty years, changes that have been evident within my lifetime, and some that their relative consistency seems to erase their past. There is much to learn in Melbourne Remade about the origins of Melbourne in trade and free enterprise and how these traditions are carried on in to our current consumer culture, how the public transport system affected the growth of inner city retail strips, the creation of a recreation space along the Yarra, and the transformation of the inner suburbs from “working class landscape[s] of production” to upmarket residential zones.
Although one aspect of Melbourne Remade that struck me was the creation of Melbourne as an event, sport and culture destination to offset the deindustrialisation and urban decay after the recessions. It was an economic necessity that has significantly boosted tourism numbers and the structure of the city itself. Even more interesting is the fact that less than 10% of the metropolitan population live in Melbourne’s inner city, so that while Melbourne city can now be seen as a hub of culture, events and recreation, this centralisation effectively distances the benefits, both cultural and economic, from the majority of the population. O’Hanlon makes a heartfelt argument, and one that I strongly agree with, that though it may not bring in the international tourists, extending these cultural renewal strategies out into the suburbs will ultimately benefit more of Melbourne’s population. I also wonder, if this sort of extensive influx of money and resources ever happens, will we see the same gentrification of the outer suburbs and industrial areas that the inner city has seen over the last 40 years, thus pushing the outer suburbs even further “out”?
Melbourne Remade shows us how a number of forces, economic, social, cultural and historical, have seen the inner city reinvent itself from a past of manufacturing and industry to a post-industrial, economically privileged retail, recreation and residential space. O’Hanlon provdies more context for these changes than you would think possible for such a physically little book, and even manages to build some hype for Arcade’s next release MacRobertsonland with the intriguing legacy of Macpherson Robertson making an appearance. Most importantly though, O’Hanlon gives us another outlook through which to view our city, through the changes that occur, and keep occuring, allowing us to build our own “visual archaeology” of Melbourne.
[Disclosure: Publisher supplied e-galley of Melbourne Remade: The Inner City Since the 70s, but then I liked it so much that I went out and bought myself a physical copy! Melbourne Remade is published by Arcade Publications, ISBN 978-0-9804367-8-5]


It seems a fitting end to 
