The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett (1930)

The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett (1930)Originally published in a serialized form in the late 1920s, Dashiell Hammett’s The Maltese Falcon was a highly influential precursor to the tremendously popular hardboiled fiction. It remains an exciting read with a detached, morally ambiguous detective and all the key elements of a noir mystery to be expected of the genre, but lacks the significant substance to make it truly remarkable.

When his partner is shot while on a stakeout for a new client, detective Sam Spade is drawn into a seedy world of bumbling policemen, beautiful and dangerous women, and treasure hunting criminals – all of them seeking the priceless ornament, the Maltese Falcon. The plot, circuitous as it is, is the supporting player to the noir style that Hammett is renowned for. Like with Chandler’s The Big Sleep, even if the reader becomess lost in the twists and double-crossings it doesn’t pose much of an issue. None of the characters ever seem to really know what is truth, who to believe or what is happening. Hammett is careful to never reveal the inner thoughts of those around Spade, we can only trust Spade’s professional intuition, his simmering violence and distrust of everything.

The boy spoke two words, the first a short guttural verb, the second ‘you.’
‘People lose teeth talking like that.’ Spade’s voice was still amiable though his face had become wooden. ‘If you want to hang around you’ll be polite.’
The boy repeated his two words.

Sam Spade is such a great character, described as “a blond Satan”, his motives are always ambiguous, even in the end, but he is just so effortlessly cool. He knows who to call, when to call, he knows the tricks to get the information he needs. Most importantly, he knows to trust no one. Not even the timid yet beautiful Brigid O’Shaughnessy that seeks his help. Of course, their relationship isn’t strictly business, and there are some tantalizing fade-to-black sex scenes, the saucier details ignored in favour of keeping the plot moving. Even if, at times, it feels like much of the plot involves the characters sitting in offices and apartments, smoking during lengthy discussions.

He shut his eyes and smiled complacently at an inner thought. He opened his eyes and said:  ‘That was seventeen years ago. Well, sir, it took me seventeen years to locate that bird, but I did it. I wanted it, and I’m not a man that’s easily discouraged when he wants something.’ His smile grew broad. ‘I wanted it and I found it. I want it and I’m going to have it.’

It would be impossible for me to review this book without mentioning the iconic film version, the 1941 film directed by John Huston and starring Humphrey Bogart – the first major film noir. Reading Joel Cairo’s affected dialogue in the Maltese Falcon, it is impossible to not hear Peter Lorre speaking them, or to picture anyone but Sydney Greenstreet as Casper Gutman. Much of the dialogue was lifted straight from the novel for the screenplay, and it must be one of the more faithful novel-to-film adaptations.

Yet, for all its seedy hardboiled style, whipsmart protagonists, crackling dialogue and swift plotting, I can’t help but feel that The Maltese Falcon is, well, empty. Not quite the fraud the characters in the novel so desperately devote themselves to, but similarly not worth as much as we’re led to believe. A successful innovator of the style, and a cleverly plotted thriller but lacking anything beyond that to really give it any weight. It just does not have the psychological depth to push it beyond being a captivating story. Perhaps this can be attributed to the lack of insight into any of the characters, we are blind to their motives – and pure greed seems too simple an answer – and their futile and ruthless search for something which may not even exist isn’t explored in any great depth. Style is the clear winner in The Maltese Falcon, and Dashiell Hammett is a skilled master of the genre.

6 thoughts on “The Maltese Falcon by Dashiell Hammett (1930)

  1. I have always wanted to read this. Until I saw the word hardboiled. This is going to sound crazy but recently I read a book, a debut novel no less, by an Australian author. I really didn’t like the book. It irritated me to no end. It was a mystery. I studied it for my book club and the author actually turned up the book club. I used this chance to ask her about her style of writing (which had irritated me to no end) and she said that she was inspired by hardboiled style. Now whenever I see that word used in relation to a book, I am turned off which is really disappointing!

    • Oh no! At least Hammett was one of the first to write in the style. Maybe it would help to think of it as tough & masculine detective fiction rather than hardboiled? I know how easy it can be to be put off something by mere association, but, you never know, you might be surprised!

      (I’m dying to know who it was, rattling my brains to try and figure it out ;) )

  2. Hi Jess,

    Great review and I’ve enjoyed reading your reflections. I’ve just read a very, very good noir mystery/spec fiction book called Expiration Date. It played a lot with time, with people’s views of reality -what is and what isn’t real- and dark and gritty.

    I couldn’t help but think about this book whilst reading your review. I found myself wondering about the genres themselves maturing, and readers becoming more sophisticated in the era of convoluted plots (i.e.Lost) and contemporary cultural cynicism.

    It makes me think of Lord of the Rings. So many idolise it, but I find it poorly edited and lacking in many areas (i.e. strong female protagonists, and truly dark, evil, passionate characters) when compared to the kinds of fantasy being now – I’m thinking of Kate Elliott and George Martin.

    I suspect that genres do indeed mature, reflect the historical/cultural milieu which gave birth to them, and build upon the earliest examples of the genre.

    I’m sure someone will make a voodoo doll of me and stick pins in it for dissing LOTR!

    • Awesome point about the evolution of genres, I really didn’t even think of it in that way. Changes within genres have to be subtle, in order to remain within the conventions of the genre – because wouldn’t breaking all the rules at once would strike it from being a piece of genre fiction? It has to be somewhat recognizable in order to subvert the paradigms. (woop woop sounding the “I studied Arts at university” alert! ;) )

      I’m going to have to go and have a bit of a deeper think about this.

      • To all those doubters who thought a BA was a useless piece of paper… we can unravel the archaeology of genres. Like Foucault did with the sciences.

        I must admit to a fair bit of paradigm subversion with my PhD …!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>